Comments on: Medal of Honor: Airborne

By: sauerfreak

sauerfreak — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:59:05 +0000

I played the demo and thought it was awesome. A sequel would be great, although it’s highly unlikely.

By: Luke

Luke — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:52:11 +0000

Hey Great review! But umm, I caught 2 uses of go**amn. And I beat the game.

By: TheWampaKing

TheWampaKing — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:04:35 +0000

This game is super average. I definitely prefer CoD4 over this. If you’re looking for an OK FPS thats cheap, this might be good. Also, the multiplayer isn’t very good.
And, in the review you make it sound like one of the best shooters ever, but you only gave it 4 stars in gameplay.

By: Drew

Drew — Wed, 06 May 2009 23:13:56 +0000

The Gameplay for this game is Really good, the Language is annoying with using Gods name in vain alot, I heard on b-word, one D-word and 3 long b-words, I dont have any COD because of the Language, and this is OK as far as that goes, it IS a bit annoying but the gameplay is REALLY good.

Verdict: I would say anybody under 10 shouldn’t play this game

By: Jake

Jake — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:02:25 +0000

When it comes to swearing, that’s the parents’ decision. I’ve played Medal of Honor games before, and my dad didn’t like me playing it because of the language.. And there was quite a bit.. But that was a different Medal of Honor, and that was a long time ago..

By: qwerty

qwerty — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:30:51 +0000

@Brian: I don't think you have to be thirteen to play this game, the swearing isn't that bad!

By: Apostle

Apostle — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:18:58 +0000

The blood didn’t worry me too much in this game, but the consistent misusing of Jesus’ name did. I mean, come on, I heard it three times in five minutes along with the d-word and long b-word.
As far as the gameplay, though, it wasn’t as good as I was hoping for. It was good none-the-less, but not as open ended I would say (I can’t tell you how many times I tried to take a path only for it to either be blocked, impossible to actually reach, or just led me back to where I started from). Overall, I think Vanguard (with less blood and profanity by the way) was a much better game.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 03:08:52 +0000

true the game is far from perfect but for 20 bucks im far from complaining

By: COD Freak

COD Freak — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:14:31 +0000

Hey, even though it wasn’t perfect, it was a step in the right direction. Seriously, open world WW2? It was a great concept. They just didn’t know how to do it, and the engine took up way too much space, so the game length is bad.

By: LGR878

LGR878 — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:43:43 +0000

I actually didn’t think the gameplay was that good, actually XD

the AI is pretty stupid and it didn’t really stick to historical accuracy like the series usually does (like the super soldiers with big machineguns and take 3 sniper hits to the head to die….)