<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/</link>
	<description>Christian Spotlight's Game Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriousGamer</title>
		<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriousGamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guide2games.org/?p=2247#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2320&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zach&lt;/a&gt;: 

I never noticed that, and I have played Shadow Dragon. Those really don&#039;t bother me that much since it is a fantasy world. Most fantasy stuff does have dragons and wizards and what-not.

Sacred Stones just would&#039;ve been a lot better for me if they hadn&#039;t actually gone into demons. I&#039;m not going to judge anyone if they really liked it. I liked the training system that&#039;s for sure. I wished they&#039;d put that into other games. And maybe if they&#039;d just given the central villian a different name it wouldn&#039;t have been such a big deal to me. The monsters don&#039;t bother me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2320" rel="nofollow">Zach</a>: </p>
<p>I never noticed that, and I have played Shadow Dragon. Those really don&#8217;t bother me that much since it is a fantasy world. Most fantasy stuff does have dragons and wizards and what-not.</p>
<p>Sacred Stones just would&#8217;ve been a lot better for me if they hadn&#8217;t actually gone into demons. I&#8217;m not going to judge anyone if they really liked it. I liked the training system that&#8217;s for sure. I wished they&#8217;d put that into other games. And maybe if they&#8217;d just given the central villian a different name it wouldn&#8217;t have been such a big deal to me. The monsters don&#8217;t bother me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guide2games.org/?p=2247#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>To serious gamer, if it makes you feel better, the newest fire emblem Shadow dragon just has a dragon and a fantasy sorcerer for main antagonist. The sorcerer sports a upside down pentagram, but i am not concerned since the charecter is a villian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To serious gamer, if it makes you feel better, the newest fire emblem Shadow dragon just has a dragon and a fantasy sorcerer for main antagonist. The sorcerer sports a upside down pentagram, but i am not concerned since the charecter is a villian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriousGamer</title>
		<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriousGamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guide2games.org/?p=2247#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2242&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zach&lt;/a&gt;: 

Point taken, but I still didn&#039;t like it. Paper Mario 2 even got ruined for me because they brought in a demon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2242" rel="nofollow">Zach</a>: </p>
<p>Point taken, but I still didn&#8217;t like it. Paper Mario 2 even got ruined for me because they brought in a demon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guide2games.org/?p=2247#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>Sorry if I sounded a little rude with the comment. when I think about it, having reviews for old ones is kind of cool to. As a note for the game fire emblem, i think the reviewer overreacted a little with the demon villian issue. It&#039;s still evil, it&#039;s still someone you don&#039;t want to be friends with (The main human villian proves that), he&#039;s also fantasy based (no ties with pentagrams, satan, or a rebellion towards God) I guess the only slight offence is that humans can kill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I sounded a little rude with the comment. when I think about it, having reviews for old ones is kind of cool to. As a note for the game fire emblem, i think the reviewer overreacted a little with the demon villian issue. It&#8217;s still evil, it&#8217;s still someone you don&#8217;t want to be friends with (The main human villian proves that), he&#8217;s also fantasy based (no ties with pentagrams, satan, or a rebellion towards God) I guess the only slight offence is that humans can kill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriousGamer</title>
		<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriousGamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guide2games.org/?p=2247#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2087&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A.M&lt;/a&gt;: 

Your obervations are accurate. Light mages (Priests and Bishops) in this game can&#039;t use Dark magic. In fact, you only get one Dark magic user, or Shaman as they&#039;re called. Well, two, because you can get a Trainee mage who can become a Shaman.

You&#039;re also right about the girls in this game, with the exception of Tethys.

I would&#039;ve enjoyed it a lot more if they didn&#039;t get into demons. Now, I don&#039;t have a problem with monsters (I&#039;m into mythology) but demons are all too real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2087" rel="nofollow">A.M</a>: </p>
<p>Your obervations are accurate. Light mages (Priests and Bishops) in this game can&#8217;t use Dark magic. In fact, you only get one Dark magic user, or Shaman as they&#8217;re called. Well, two, because you can get a Trainee mage who can become a Shaman.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also right about the girls in this game, with the exception of Tethys.</p>
<p>I would&#8217;ve enjoyed it a lot more if they didn&#8217;t get into demons. Now, I don&#8217;t have a problem with monsters (I&#8217;m into mythology) but demons are all too real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.M</title>
		<link>http://guide2games.org/2009-reviews/2247/fire-emblem-the-sacred-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>A.M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guide2games.org/?p=2247#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>I have yet to play the Sacred Stones, but I&#039;ve played the first and enjoyed it immensely. I loved how they set up the morality and concepts of good and evil. Especially the magic system.

When judging fantasy worlds based on the Christian worldview I like to look at the elements and themes presented in the magic, and look past the fact that it is fantasy &#039;magic&#039; we&#039;re dealing with. The good magic, the &#039;Light&#039; power, has an advantage over the evil &#039;dark&#039; magic. From what I&#039;ve seen in the first Fire Emblem- this may or may not apply to this game- a mage specialized in the Light cannot use Dark magic. This was a relief for me! I hate how commonly fantasy takes both &#039;light&#039; and &#039;dark&#039; magic and allows it to be used interchangeably. Fire Emblem draws a line between good and evil and shows it for what it really is. Evil is weaker then good- for your armies can defeat their enemies even as they are largely outnumbered. 

Not only that, but the content is squeaky clean. All of the females, from what I&#039;ve seen, are actually clothed- a very uncommon thing to find in fantasies these days. The language is very tame- some harsher words coming from the bad guys and occasionally a good guy will call a bad guy a name when their temper is short.  The combat is bloodless and focuses on strategy more then the battle itself- once you set up your unit on the battlefield, you don&#039;t even control their attacks- you just sit by and watch the quick and bloodless cutscene. 

I can only imagine that Sacred Stones contains content as tame and enjoyable as the first, but I have yet to play it. Hopefully my observations remain true to this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to play the Sacred Stones, but I&#8217;ve played the first and enjoyed it immensely. I loved how they set up the morality and concepts of good and evil. Especially the magic system.</p>
<p>When judging fantasy worlds based on the Christian worldview I like to look at the elements and themes presented in the magic, and look past the fact that it is fantasy &#8216;magic&#8217; we&#8217;re dealing with. The good magic, the &#8216;Light&#8217; power, has an advantage over the evil &#8216;dark&#8217; magic. From what I&#8217;ve seen in the first Fire Emblem- this may or may not apply to this game- a mage specialized in the Light cannot use Dark magic. This was a relief for me! I hate how commonly fantasy takes both &#8216;light&#8217; and &#8216;dark&#8217; magic and allows it to be used interchangeably. Fire Emblem draws a line between good and evil and shows it for what it really is. Evil is weaker then good- for your armies can defeat their enemies even as they are largely outnumbered. </p>
<p>Not only that, but the content is squeaky clean. All of the females, from what I&#8217;ve seen, are actually clothed- a very uncommon thing to find in fantasies these days. The language is very tame- some harsher words coming from the bad guys and occasionally a good guy will call a bad guy a name when their temper is short.  The combat is bloodless and focuses on strategy more then the battle itself- once you set up your unit on the battlefield, you don&#8217;t even control their attacks- you just sit by and watch the quick and bloodless cutscene. </p>
<p>I can only imagine that Sacred Stones contains content as tame and enjoyable as the first, but I have yet to play it. Hopefully my observations remain true to this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

