Comments on: Marvel: Ultimate Alliance 2

By: Monkeyman164

Monkeyman164 — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:46:56 +0000

I actually thought it would be worse then it was. I don't know if the playstation2 version is like the Xbox360 version I have, but the only words that where bad in the Xbox360 version was hell.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:24:54 +0000

I dunno about that. Like, really, Spider-Man 2 is better than the third on the Nintendo consoles. So, why can't third be any better than the second? And on the Wii? I mean, it's not like the companies are short of material to work with, or short of knowledge. Maybe those companies are trying to make an easy buck on the Wii with the "Oh, it's got motion sensing!" idea. I can see that happening. Idiots wanting a break. But, once you get down to it, the motion sensing is more of the same. I mean, wave it around, make scripted slashes in the game, etc. It's nothing that great, really. I like the other systems and the PC.

By: (guest)

(guest) — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:43:52 +0000

I think the Wii ports are bad because the third-party companies try to make it do things that are just out of reach of its capabilities, rather than working within its limits and making the best of them.

Nintendo, on the other hand, knows its console very well, which is why their Wii games (SSBB, Super Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 3, Donkey Kong Country Returns, etc.) work out so well.

By: (guest)

(guest) — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:39:04 +0000

That I could agree with. Why can't more game look like MP1?

By: Person

Person — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:38:35 +0000

The frame rate of Metroid Prime is 60 frames, unlike the 30 frames of the console versions of both Halos. So yes, Metroid Prime looks better than them AND is technically better with frame rate. Still, I'd say Starfox Adventures is better than both of them.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:54:00 +0000

I believe I did, yes. Come to think of it, (having read it more thoroughly, with my head screwed on properly (that is to say, not reading it at 1A.M.)) I wonder what good it really would be. Unless, MS and Sony aren't making a good profit on their systems, compared to the Wii. If that's the case, well, I'm not sure why they would bribe those companies, seeing as they have quite a hefty profit from the games already for sale on their systems. Now, I'm at a complete loss as to why there are bad ports on the Wii. Hmm…maybe Nintendo's gone senile? That's about all I can figure. Unless, MS and Sony don't mind losing a bit of money to give the Wii bad publicity. Even after their best, underhanded (if any) attempts to discredit the Wii, it still is outselling them. Now, I'm not so sure. It still bothers me that the Wii still has bad ports.

As for how much MS and Sony may be able to compensate, I'm sure they could compensate enough. Subsidize the companies of the bad port and whatnot.

I guess I could have put that better. I just felt C2L might have said ridiculous was a good word because he may still have a grudge against me. I must admit, I was somewhat vicious in arguing. My rage at thinking that Christian people would play something as viciously violent as Gears of War got the better of me. I was also very proud of myself back then. Exactly what I didn't want to be in the first place. Like Anakin, I was. Becoming exactly what I didn't want to be.